|

Poll: 90% in B.C. and Ontario say HST is a government tax grab


hstTORONTO – A solid majority, 90 per cent, of British Columbians and Ontarians think the HST is a tax grab by both levels of government, according to a new poll conducted by Ipsos Reid.

On July 1, 2010, the provincial governments of Ontario and British Columbia are planning to combine their respective provincial sales taxes (PST) with the federal goods and services tax (GST) to create a single, harmonized sales (HST).

But according to a new Ipsos Reid poll conducted on behalf of Canwest News Service and Global National, a vast majority of British Columbians (82%) and Ontarians (74%) oppose their provincial government’s plans to harmonize the sales tax.

Conversely, just one in ten British Columbians (11%) and Ontarians (12%) support the initiative, while a similar proportion doesn’t know (14% Ontario, 7% British Columbia) what to think about the initiative.

It appears that awareness of the government’s plan is relatively high with most British Columbians (73%) and Ontarians (65%) indicating that they know at least some things about the proposed HST, while fewer know very little or nothing (35% Ontario, 27% BC).

Based on what they have seen, read or heard about the proposed HST, most think that the big beneficiaries of the HST will be governments as most Ontarians and British Columbians believe that the Provincial Governments of BC (90%) and Ontario (82%) would benefit from the plan, as well as the Federal Government (82% BC, 72% Ontario).

While proponents of the HST argue that the new tax would be beneficial for businesses, a higher proportion believes that the tax won’t benefit business (49% BC, 46% Ontario) rather than will benefit them (39% BC and Ontario).

According to those polled, the big losers will be consumers at large, with most saying the new HST will not benefit consumers (91% BC, 84% Ontario) rather than benefit them (4% Ontario, 3% BC). Moreover, only a small proportion (16% BC, 15% Ontario) believes that retailers would pass along to consumers any savings they received from the HST, while most (75% BC, 74% Ontario) believe they wouldn’t. One in ten (11% Ontario, 9% BC) are unsure.

Nine in ten (90%) overall are closer to the opinion that ‘the HST is just a huge tax grab by the provincial government and businesses might not reduce their base prices after implementation and pass the savings onto consumers, tax-included pricing (or “hidden taxation”) will occur, and there will be hidden administrative costs for businesses’.

On the other hand, one in ten (10%) more closely agree with the sentiment that ‘while prices for some products and services will rise with the HST, it will make businesses more competitive by lowering their taxes, passing on savings to consumers, creating more jobs and is good for the economy as well as for government revenues’.

Respondents were asked whether knowing a few points about the HST would make them more likely to support it:

•If they knew the HST legislation may include cuts to personal income, small business and corporate taxes, provide house purchase rebates and tax rebate cheques to families, seniors and others to help offset the impact of the HST, and exempt some products like meals under $4, coffee and newspapers, one in three (35% Ontario, 33% BC) would be more likely to support the HST, while nearly one quarter (22% Ontario and BC) would be less likely to support it.

•If they knew that Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland and Labrador have all harmonized their sales taxes with the GST and British Columbia and Ontario will join in moving to a single sales tax on July 1, one in ten (12% Ontario, 11% BC) would be more likely to support the tax, while roughly one quarter (26% BC. 22% Ontario) would be less likely.

When it comes to their spending habits, a majority of British Columbians (72%) and Ontarians (64%) anticipate that the new harmonized tax will affect their day-to-day purchasing decisions – mostly for the worse. Among those who say it will impact their decisions, most (87% BC, 85% Ontario) intend to spend less as a result, while few (2% Ontario, 0% BC) would spend more as a result.

The data reveals that Ontarians and British Columbians believe the HST will be more negative on the economy than the GST has been since introduced in 1993. Over the longer term, a majority (56% BC, 52% Ontario) believes that the HST will have a negative impact on their province’s economy over the next five years. Nearly two in ten (18% Ontario, 14% BC) think the impact will be positive, while three in ten (30% Ontario, 29% BC) think it will have no impact over the long run.

By comparison, a minority (45% BC, 44% Ontario) believes the GST, introduced in 1993, has had a negative impact on Canada’s economy, while two in ten (21% Ontario, 19% BC) believe its impact has been positive. Almost four in ten (36% BC, 35% Ontario) consider the GST’s impact to have had no meaningful impact over the last two decades.

These are some of the findings of an Ipsos Reid poll conducted between November 23 and 30, 2009, on behalf of Canwest News Service and Global National. For this survey, a sample of 1,049 adults from British Columbia and 1,962 from Ontario from Ipsos’ Canadian online panel was interviewed online. Weighting was then employed to balance demographics and ensure that the sample’s composition reflects that of the adult population in those provinces according to Census data and to provide results intended to approximate the sample universe. A survey with an unweighted probability sample of this size and a 100% response rate would have an estimated margin of error of +/-3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20, in B.C. and +/-2.3 percentage points, 19 times out of 20, in Ontario of what the results would have been had the entire population of adults in BC and Ontario been polled. All sample surveys and polls may be subject to other sources of error, including, but not limited to coverage error, and measurement error.


Copyright 2009, Vancouverite News Service. Use this article on your blog or website for just $5. News organizations pay $25. To reproduce or distribute, click: http://vancouverite.icopyright.com



Copyright 2009-2014, Vancouverite News Service.
http://vancouverite.icopyright.com

News Editor Posted by on Dec 5 2009. Filed under Canada, Featured. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

4 Comments for “Poll: 90% in B.C. and Ontario say HST is a government tax grab”

  1. [...] Reactions to the HST have been mixed at best. The NDP have roundly condemned the tax, claiming that it is a tax grab that will help provinces accumulate up to 3.5 billion dollars in revenue, the purpose of which is unclear. Public opinion in both Ontario and B.C. have been vastly negative, with estimates of 90% in both pro…. [...]

  2. There has been, a lay off again, 300 mill workers just lost their jobs, today. I won’t be surprised if, Campbell will ship this mill to China, along with the other mills he sent. The, number of people, with no jobs, losing their homes and seniors, will take the worst hit, of all, because, of the HST. How can Harper, Iggy, Campbell and Hansen, remotely think, these people can pay the stupid HST. The HST, will be shifted to the backs of people like us. And, we are tired of being shafted, over and over again. Harper, needs to clean up the corruption in, Canada. Harper, should not use the dirty tactics to evade questions.

  3. The HST was not designed in mind, for low income families and seniors. This is just another corrupt tax , to benefit, big business. The HST, will just be another way to shift the burden to those who can’t afford to keep up with sky rocketing food prices, insurances and taxes. We, low income people are being victimized by greedy government officials. They make more money in a day, than most of us have to live on for a month. I am old, and I have never before seen Canada, so shameful in my life, until now.

  4. I am a senior living on my own, so I have no one to share expenses. A senior with no tax write offs means, when tax time comes about, I have to also pay income tax, no matter, if I live under the poverty level. Utilities and food is the only way low income people can cut back, I am down to the bare bones. I also have a mortgage to pay, so, I have to sell my house before I lose it. The problem is, there are so many lay offs, I don’t think my house will sell. The HST will cause me to lose my home, and rents are more than my mortgage. I will have to live on the street, as will low income people and their children. The HST, is a very unfair tax. Single mothers and children, that have an $8.00 an hour wage, have to pay the same percentage as some one making $40.00 an hour. Rebates, will not work, we will run out of money, in 1 week and be homeless in 1 month. Campbell and Hansen, lack logistics, and there is going to be one big mess. We citizens don’t have an unlimited expense accounts as they do, we can’t give ourselves 53% pay hikes. If you income is under 1,700 a month with the HST, you will end up living on the street. Convince me this HST is good for citizens under poverty level. Big corporations, only hire part time workers, so they don’t have to pay for any benefits to their employees. Campbell Hansen, Iggy and Harper, have do a a reality check.

Leave a Reply